This page is the authoritative methodology for the Perpetual class – what reconstitution is, how candidate markets are evaluated, how often the series is reviewed, how investors acknowledge the terms, and how rebalancing costs are disclosed. For the arithmetic of chain-linking, see NAV Methodology.
Fixed vs. Perpetual at a Glance
| Property | Fixed Series | Perpetual Series |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | Locked at publication; never changes | May be modified through formal reconstitution events |
| Maturity | Defined by resolution of all constituent markets | Open-ended; series runs until archived |
| Market additions | Not possible | Added through reconstitution |
| Market removals | Not possible | Not possible – resolved markets exit via settlement, new markets are only added |
| Review cadence | N/A | Committed at creation (default: monthly) |
| Index history | Continuous from inception to terminal NAV | Continuous across reconstitutions via chain-linking |
| Mint/redeem pause during reconstitution | N/A | Yes – during the reconstitution gate |
The Analogy
A Perpetual series works like a reconstituting equity index. The S&P 500 does not hold the same 500 companies forever – its index committee periodically adds and removes constituents as the market evolves. An ETF tracking the S&P 500 rebalances its holdings to match the new composition. The index level remains continuous across those reconstitutions; the rebalancing trades are absorbed in the fund’s tracking difference. A Perpetual Belief Index series follows the same convention:- New constituent markets are added through a formal reconstitution event initiated by Belief Systems.
- The fund trades on the prediction market exchange to align its custody holdings with the new target composition.
- The reported index level is continuous across the event – no visible step in the chart.
- The cost of rebalancing is absorbed in NAV and borne by existing investors, consistent with standard index fund practice.
Reconstitution is initiated by Belief Systems and subject to a published review cadence. It is never retroactive – composition changes are forward-looking.
Market Selection Criteria
Candidate markets for inclusion in a Perpetual series are evaluated against six qualitative criteria. These are directional – they do not specify hard numerical thresholds, and are applied together rather than as a checklist.| Criterion | What it means |
|---|---|
| Thematic relevance | The market must be directly related to the series’ stated theme or risk domain. |
| Liquidity depth | The market should exhibit sufficient order book depth to support entry at reasonable size without excessive slippage. |
| Trading volume | The market should demonstrate meaningful daily trading activity, indicating sustained participant interest. |
| Bid-ask spread quality | The market should have reasonably tight spreads, indicating healthy two-sided participation. |
| Time horizon | The market’s expected resolution date should fall within the series’ intended lifecycle. |
| Outcome clarity | The market’s resolution criteria must be unambiguous and verifiable. |
Review Cadence
Each Perpetual series specifies a review cadence at creation. The default cadence is monthly.- The review cadence is a commitment to evaluate the series composition on that frequency – not a commitment to change it.
- A review may conclude that no new market meets the selection criteria, in which case the composition is unchanged and the outcome is recorded.
- The review cadence is displayed on each series’ detail page.
Chain-Linking (Index Continuity)
When composition changes, the raw probability-weighted aggregate (raw_nav) changes mechanically – different markets, different weights, different numbers. A Perpetual series uses chain-linking to ensure the reported index level is continuous across the change.
Re-base
A new
inception_raw_nav is computed such that the first post-reconstitution index level equals the anchor.Why `raw_nav` is not continuous but `index_level` is
Why `raw_nav` is not continuous but `index_level` is
Reconstitution Drag
Rebalancing custody to match the new composition has a real cost – spreads, slippage, and any placement cost on the CLOB. That cost is the reconstitution drag: the gap between realized NAV performance and the theoretical chain-linked index level over a reconstitution event.- Drag is absorbed in NAV, consistent with ETF convention. There is no separate reconstitution fee.
- Drag is borne by existing investors of the series that incurs it. It is not netted across series.
- Drag is disclosed as methodology, not hidden. The term “reconstitution drag” is the standard index-fund term for the same concept.
An investor minting into a Perpetual series acknowledges reconstitution drag as part of the pre-mint disclosure. The substance of that acknowledgment is: composition may change over time, rebalancing costs are absorbed in NAV, and mint/redeem may be temporarily paused during reconstitution events.
The Reconstitution Gate
During a reconstitution, the series enters a gate – a planned, bounded pause on mint, redeem, and NAV computation.| Dimension | Behavior during the gate |
|---|---|
| Mint | Paused. New orders are rejected with a reconstitution-in-progress reason code. |
| Redeem | Paused. New orders are rejected with the same reason code. |
| NAV computation | Suspended. The last pre-gate NAV remains authoritative. |
| Other series | Unaffected. The gate is scoped to the reconstituting series only. |
| Typical duration | Resolves within roughly 48 hours of activation. |
Investor Acknowledgment
Minting into a Perpetual series is a materially different act from minting into a Fixed series. The composition an investor mints into may change after the mint, through a reconstitution event the investor did not individually authorize. Belief Systems does not issue a prospectus. The pre-mint disclosure serves the equivalent function. Every mint order on a Perpetual series requires explicit acknowledgment that:- The series is a Perpetual series and its market composition may change over time through reconstitution.
- Reconstitution costs are absorbed in NAV and borne by existing investors, consistent with standard index fund practice.
- Mints and redeems may be temporarily paused during reconstitution events.
- By minting, the investor accepts these terms.
Audit Trail
Every reconstitution event produces a complete, auditable record:- Date and time of the event.
- Markets added, with question text and condition identifiers.
- Weight changes: before and after, for each market.
- Chain-link anchor: the index level preserved across the event.
- Composition version: the before and after SHA256-tagged identifiers.
- Rebalance trades executed, with fill details.
- Realized reconstitution cost.
- Event status: completed or aborted, with reason.
What This Does Not Change
Everything else about how a Belief Index series works continues to hold for Perpetual series:- Physical backing. Every share remains backed by actual prediction market positions held in custody. No synthetic exposure.
- Mint and redeem at NAV windows. Outside of the gate, Perpetual series operate on the same NAV-window cadence as Fixed series.
- Rules-based methodology. Market selection for inclusion in a Perpetual series follows the six qualitative criteria in Market Selection Criteria above.
- Full audit trail. Every reconstitution event produces a complete record – composition version from and to, chain-link anchor, trades executed, and realized cost.
Further Reading
NAV Methodology
Including §4.8 on chain-linking arithmetic and §5.4 for a worked example.
Index Series
Foundational concepts: composition, weighting, lifecycle.
Risk Factors
Risks including concentration, correlation, resolution, and reconstitution.
Glossary
Term definitions including chain-linking, reconstitution drag, and maturity type.